#1692 closed defect (wontfix)
Add sugar-settings-manager
| Reported by: | sayamindu | Owned by: | tomeu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Sugar | Version: | Unspecified |
| Severity: | Unspecified | Keywords: | r! |
| Cc: | sdz, erikos | Distribution/OS: | Unspecified |
| Bug Status: | New |
Description
The code for sugar-settings-manager lives in
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-settings-manager
Patch for starting up the manager:
diff --git a/bin/sugar.in b/bin/sugar.in
index 498b573..813b189 100644
--- a/bin/sugar.in
+++ b/bin/sugar.in
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ while [ $# -ne 0 ] ; do
shift
done
+sugar-settings-manager &
+
if test -z "$SUGAR_SCALING"; then
export SUGAR_SCALING=72
fi
Attachments (2)
Change History (11)
Changed 14 years ago by sayamindu
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by sayamindu
- Keywords r? added
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by sayamindu
Patch against sugar-toolkit is at http://pastebin.be/23210 (Trac won't let me attach it since it thinks it is spam)
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by tomeu
- Keywords r! added; r? removed
I think that we should have a release of settings-manager before sugar can depend on it. Also, are you going to maintain that module in sugar? Or as an external dependency?
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by sayamindu
I can do a release immediately. Which makes more sense - as a submodule inside sugar, or as an external project.
comment:5 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 14 years ago by sdz
- Cc sdz erikos added
What's the best way to proceed here? We got it reviewed and built in Fedora so far. So should we temporarily apply these two patches?
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 Changed 14 years ago by tomeu
Replying to sdz:
What's the best way to proceed here? We got it reviewed and built in Fedora so far. So should we temporarily apply these two patches?
If you really want, sure. But the reason why upstream Sugar is not depending on the settings-manager yet is because we don't have any UI yet for changing the font size, so it wouldn't bring us any benefit. But it may land in a later 0.88 minor release if a deployment asks strongly for it.
comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by erikos
- Bug Status changed from Unconfirmed to New
- Milestone changed from Unspecified by Release Team to 0.90
I move this to 0.90. If a deployment cares strongly for this to be present, we can move it to 0.88.x. Please comment in this ticket, if.
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by dnarvaez
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from new to closed
After 3 years it seems we lost the train on this, also I have the feeling gtk is moving away from settings manager these days.
Patch for sugar-jhbuild