#2330 closed enhancement (fixed)
turtle art math blocks should expand
| Reported by: | walter | Owned by: | walter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: | Unspecified |
| Component: | Turtleart | Version: | Unspecified |
| Severity: | Unspecified | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | tonyforster | Distribution/OS: | Unspecified |
| Bug Status: | Unconfirmed |
Description
It would be nice if the math operator blocks would expand vertically to eliminate overlaps.
Attachments (4)
Change History (16)
Changed 13 years ago by walter
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by walter
Still need to add the boolean operators
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by walter
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by walter
In light of #2336, I wonder if we shouldn't consider removing the expand/shrink handles on these blocks (except for the boolean blocks, for which cascading doesn't work.)?
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by tonyforster
Playing with v99 of 26hrs ago:
Sometimes blocks autoexpand unnecessarily (set xy expands when plugging an expression into y even though theres no overlap) (setx=0 sety=1*1+1*1)
You might wish to purposefully overlap to save precious screen space, I have often done that in the past
Expanding a boolean undocks it (it extends from the bottom and undocks from if)
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by tonyforster
V99 of 26 hrs ago becomes unresponsive eg
docking
repeat (myblock x )
undocking
python function
no error logged
is there a later version?
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by tonyforster
same with V99 of 15 hrs ago
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by walter
Sometimes blocks autoexpand unnecessarily (set xy expands when plugging an expression into y even though theres no overlap) (setx=0 sety=1*1+1*1)
Found and fixed this problem (http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/turtleart/repos/mainline/commits/02ff768760dc5b487854d460bd101fb2d014aec4)
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by walter
Expanding a boolean undocks it (it extends from the bottom and undocks from if)
Found and fixed this problem (http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/turtleart/repos/mainline/commits/0a0583a17b826ce376ca35e16d4db568c81c739e)
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by walter
V99 of 26 hrs ago becomes unresponsive eg
docking
repeat (myblock x )
undocking
python function
Not sure if I understand what it is you are doing here. I haven't been able to reproduce the error. However, I did add a patch to cascade the expanding function block f(x) -> f(x,y) -> f(x,y,z) so that the docked block also expands when necessary.
I'll be maintaining a new version of v99 attached here for testing:
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/2336/TurtleArt-99.xo
Changed 13 years ago by tonyforster
Changed 13 years ago by tonyforster
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by tonyforster
sorry, misseda block or two
repeat
extend right
+
myblock
see screenshot
comment:12 Changed 13 years ago by walter
The screenshot helped... found an infinite loop bug that I fixed:
I'll post the updated version attached to 2336 again.
first pass at patch