Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#4905 closed defect (invalid)
Display icon invisible
| Reported by: | SAMdroid | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | Unspecified |
| Component: | Sugar | Version: | Unspecified |
| Severity: | Minor | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Quozl | Distribution/OS: | OLPC |
| Bug Status: | Unconfirmed |
Description
The display icon in the frame takes up space and is clickable, however it is invisible!
Tested on xo4 with olpc os 14 and sugar 0.107.0.olpc.
From the log: "No icon with the name brightness-100 was found in the theme"
Please see the picture attached.
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
Changed 8 years ago by SAMdroid
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by ignacio
(Just for be sure)
Can you check if brightness-100.svg is in /usr/share/icons/sugar/scalable/device in the XO, and check if its on sugar-build/build/out/share/icons/sugar/scalable/device (or something like that, I don't have sugar-build right now) (the file should be there)
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by SAMdroid
There is no icon file on the xo. However there is inside sugar-build. Maybe a packaging error?
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by ignacio
Can you attach the output of
# yum install tree tree /usr/share/icons/sugar/scalable
it could be useful for compare sugar-build version and the xo one
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by quozl
Assuming you used the packages in the way you described in #4903, you've merely forgotten to include the sugar-artwork package, which has these icons. Please try upgrading this package to match the others, restart, and see if the icon is present.
If that solves the problem, then perhaps Sugar needs to use some default icon for missing icon?
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by SAMdroid
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from new to closed
No, sugar should not aim to deal with then the user circumvents normal methods (eg. dnf update) and ends up with a mucked up system. It's very valid to assume that the user can actually use a package manager correctly, or that the packager set the right deps.
So yeah, it was my fault for not downloading the right packages.
Picture of the issue