#484 closed defect (incomplete)
successful file transfer: offer to open Journal and to open activity
| Reported by: | tomeu | Owned by: | tomeu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Sugar | Version: | Git as of bugdate |
| Severity: | Major | Keywords: | sugar-love |
| Cc: | eben, sascha_silbe, smparrish | Distribution/OS: | Ubuntu |
| Bug Status: | Needinfo |
Description
As the transfer cannot be canceled any more, this option should change to say "Dismiss".
Eben, please comment.
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by eben
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by tomeu
- Milestone changed from 0.84 to 0.86
Added Dismiss option as discussed. Moving to 0.86
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by homunq
- Keywords sugar-love added
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by sascha_silbe
- Cc sascha_silbe added
- Summary changed from file transfer: when a transfer finishes successfully, invitations still display a Cancel option to successful file transfer: offer to open Journal and to open activity
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by smparrish
- Cc smparrish added
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by smparrish
- seeta_dev set to Mukul
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by dnarvaez
- Resolution set to incomplete
- Status changed from new to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Yes, "Cancel" seems incorrect in that context, and "Dismiss" seems appropriate. However, there may be other useful actions we can offer. What about "Show in Journal" and "Open With >" and "Erase" as well? I'm slightly uncertain about the last one; I guess we should assume that a completed transfer is something one wants to keep, in general, and one could always go to the Journal to erase it.
I think "Show in Journal", "Open with >", and "Dismiss" should all be provided (in that order), and my inclination is that all of these actions should dismiss the transfer as well, the first two with the additional action.
Thoughts?