Opened 12 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#2592 closed defect (obsolete)
[dx2] Favorites view | Scattered layout | Overlapping icons incorrectly placed after restarting
Reported by: | m_anish | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | Unspecified |
Component: | Sugar | Version: | Unspecified |
Severity: | Minor | Keywords: | dx2 |
Cc: | garymartin | Distribution/OS: | Dextrose |
Bug Status: | Unconfirmed |
Description (last modified by m_anish)
Testcase:
- Open favorites view
- Select scattered layout, icons are randomly placed
- Try to drag one activity icon over another
(Sugar intelligently places them one next to another and not overlapping)
4.A Restart sugar
OR
4.B. Try dragging the icons one over another again
5.A. Icons reduce in their size
AND/OR
5.B. Icons overlap and cover each other up
Seen on Dextrose and sugar-jhbuild
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by m_anish
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by walter
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by walter
Note that this patch was never applied. It doesn't address this specific ticket, but it is a much cleaner implementation of the spiral code than is currently in mainline.
Note that this patch applies to the 0.88 version of favoriteslayout.py
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 12 years ago by walter
- Cc garymartin added
I still cannot reproduce the overlap problem, but the problem with shrinking is failing to account for the increase in the maximum size of the icons in the Ring View.
The question is, what should be the size of the icons in the Random View? Should it track the size in the Ring View?
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by m_anish
- Priority changed from Unspecified by Maintainer to Normal
- Severity changed from Unspecified to Minor
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 12 years ago by m_anish
Replying to walter:
I still cannot reproduce the overlap problem, but the problem with shrinking is failing to account for the increase in the maximum size of the icons in the Ring View.
The question is, what should be the size of the icons in the Random View? Should it track the size in the Ring View?
<walterbender> silbe, m_anish: re #2592, it was decided to keep the Random icons always at 'Standard Size'
<m_anish> walterbender, but the current behavior is that the icon size gets reduced?
<walterbender> m_anish: only if you start with large icons
<walterbender> m_anish: if the icons are never large, they won't shrink
<walterbender> m_anish: I introduced the regression when I make the icons large by default.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by dnarvaez
- Resolution set to obsolete
- Status changed from new to closed
Very old, unreproducable bug.
I cannot reproduce this on the 0.90.1 Sugar on Fedora 14 or in sugar-jhbuild.