#1497 closed defect (fixed)
Name input screen should be deactivable
Reported by: | quidam | Owned by: | tomeu |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: | |
Component: | Sugar | Version: | 0.86.x |
Severity: | Unspecified | Keywords: | r+ |
Cc: | alsroot | Distribution/OS: | Unspecified |
Bug Status: | New |
Description
The "enter your name" screen is only needed in live environments. If Sugar is ran in a normal installed to disk environment, the user will need to provide a name and password to start the session, so asking for a name again is not needed (as it could be loaded from $USER).
A configuration file enabling or disabling the screen would be the best way to do this, as it would allow the session loader to avoid distribution-dependent checks.
Attachments (1)
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by alsroot
- Milestone changed from Unspecified by Release Team to 0.88
- Version changed from Git as of bugdate to 0.86.x
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by alsroot
- Keywords r? added
Changed 13 years ago by alsroot
comment:3 follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed 13 years ago by alsroot
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 3 ; follow-up: ↓ 5 Changed 13 years ago by sascha_silbe
Replying to alsroot:
predefined values:
- "disabled" ask nick on initialization
- "passwd" use gecos/name from passwd file
- otherwise use prop value as is for nick value
This is just about the default text for the name prompt, right? The name prompt will still get shown?
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 13 years ago by alsroot
Replying to sascha_silbe:
Replying to alsroot:
predefined values:
- "disabled" ask nick on initialization
- "passwd" use gecos/name from passwd file
- otherwise use prop value as is for nick value
This is just about the default text for the name prompt, right? The name prompt will still get shown?
In attached patch, the name prompt will be shown only if default_nick is disabled.
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by tomeu
- Keywords r+ added; r? removed
Sounds good to me, some comments:
- s/passwd/system?
- can we use a more descriptive name than 'pw'?
Thanks, please push.
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by alsroot
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
with fixed review comments
predefined values: