Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#465 closed defect (notsugar)
This program restarts X and Sugar on an XO
| Reported by: | NoiseEHC | Owned by: | tomeu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: | Unspecified |
| Component: | Sugar | Version: | 0.82.x |
| Severity: | Unspecified | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Distribution/OS: | OLPC | |
| Bug Status: | Needinfo |
Description
Build 800 (latest signed build)
Run from the terminal activity (a.out).
There are no interesting things in the logs shown by the log viewer, and nothing interesting on the virtual console.
I can attach those logs if you can tell me which ones.
(Compiling from sources require "yum install gcc make gcc-c++ libX11-devel libXv-devel")
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
Changed 15 years ago by NoiseEHC
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by tomeu
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by NoiseEHC
I have no idea how to run just an xterm instead of sugar. If you can type in the commands I have to issue then I can do that but probably it would be much easier just to run the executable on an XO yourself. a.out is included in the build so you do not even have to set up the compiling environment.
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by erikos
- Bug Status changed from Unconfimed to Needinfo
- Version changed from Unspecified to 0.82.x
Well, the question is, if it restarts X because Sugar crashes, or if it crashes X.
comment:4 Changed 15 years ago by walter
I tried it in a Gnome desktop on Ubuntu and while I expect that it didn't run properly, it did not crash X
comment:5 Changed 15 years ago by erikos
- Resolution set to notsugar
- Status changed from new to closed
We do not think this is a bug in Sugar. Feel free to reopen if you think otherwise and best provide logs that state though.
Could you try to run this program on the XO but without running sugar? Just run a xterm instead of sugar and execute the binary from there. Thanks!